<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reconstruction as Agitation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://htcexperiments.org/2009/09/21/reconstruction-as-agitation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://htcexperiments.org/2009/09/21/reconstruction-as-agitation/</link>
	<description>Experimental practices in architectural history, theory, and criticism -- organized by David Gissen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny</title>
		<link>http://htcexperiments.org/2009/09/21/reconstruction-as-agitation/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htcexperiments.org/?p=1527#comment-254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m researching on a horizontal vs vertical spaces in architecture. Can anyone give me a reference on this topic? i appreciate your help..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m researching on a horizontal vs vertical spaces in architecture. Can anyone give me a reference on this topic? i appreciate your help..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlgissen</title>
		<link>http://htcexperiments.org/2009/09/21/reconstruction-as-agitation/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dlgissen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htcexperiments.org/?p=1527#comment-221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for visiting. And yes, that&#039;s a very good point about Knossos. I just read a review (by Mary Beard) in the New York Review of Books ton a new book about the Minoan reconstructions. Have you seen it? her conclusion was a bit of a head scratcher; but I think she was arguing for acknowledgment of the artifice of reconstructions; and she further argues how  this artifice may serve present artistic problems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for visiting. And yes, that&#8217;s a very good point about Knossos. I just read a review (by Mary Beard) in the New York Review of Books ton a new book about the Minoan reconstructions. Have you seen it? her conclusion was a bit of a head scratcher; but I think she was arguing for acknowledgment of the artifice of reconstructions; and she further argues how  this artifice may serve present artistic problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carldouglas</title>
		<link>http://htcexperiments.org/2009/09/21/reconstruction-as-agitation/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carldouglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://htcexperiments.org/?p=1527#comment-220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s also interesting to consider sites where the physical reconstruction has been agitative - or at least agitating. sir arthur evans&#039;s reconstructions at knossos (1904-1930, much of it in reinforced concrete) are deeply problematic, because they were constructed in situ according to evans&#039;s own sometimes dubious interpretations, and the reconstructions cannot be distinguished from the &#039;original&#039; remains with very much certainty. his reconstructions were as much a kind of utopianism as historical visualisation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s also interesting to consider sites where the physical reconstruction has been agitative &#8211; or at least agitating. sir arthur evans&#8217;s reconstructions at knossos (1904-1930, much of it in reinforced concrete) are deeply problematic, because they were constructed in situ according to evans&#8217;s own sometimes dubious interpretations, and the reconstructions cannot be distinguished from the &#8216;original&#8217; remains with very much certainty. his reconstructions were as much a kind of utopianism as historical visualisation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

