Anvironment: An experimental history project
[To be expanded for a forthcoming article]
If a stable, humidity, temperature, dust, and pest controlled environment is the ideal setting for preserving historical material, could we produce the inverse environment? In other words, if late-modern history relies on a type of ecosystem for the preservation and study of historical material, could we produce the anti-ecosystem of historical maintenance?
This anvironment (parallel or anti-environment) would be a space where historical preservation was impossible but that would nonetheless be a stable integrated nature. Like a black hole in a historical universe; the eye of a historical hurricane.
So consider some type of room with incredible levels of humidity, swirling dust, and horrible heat. It would be a place that also happened to represent two of the West’s key enviro-phobias — tropiphobia and aridiphobia. This room would be an orangey green place of sweat and dirt where pieces of paper, building elements, and other artifacts don’t stand a chance of surviving.
Ultimately, such a place forces us to reflect on the stability required for history, and the environments lurking in our future.
July 2, 2009 at 6:36 pm
i think this ‘anvironment’ exists already. its called ‘Summer in New York City.’
July 3, 2009 at 10:32 am
one of the biggest ‘threats’ to historical material is light, it can degrade and destroy in a much more effective way 😉
add direct sunlight or greenhouse to this 🙂
July 3, 2009 at 9:01 pm
Martin: Yes! in fact, NYC museums have been some of the most innovative in the development of preservation environments, particularly the Metropolitan.
Sjaw: Good point; light can be destructive too, although it depends on the item being preserved (eg. marble will be ok); so yes, I’ll make sure to include a searing sun in the future of the project. Thanks, David